Master
Developer Team Proposals
Proposal
Evaluation Form
Please complete this evaluation form for each of the three University Gateway Center proposals. Your comments are important to the evaluation process and will be most helpful if sent by March 14, 1999. The evaluation forms will continue to be collected through the end of March.
Please copy and paste these questions into the body of an e-mail message.
Send the message with your answers to: camppart@osu.edu
You may also download a pdf file of this form to print and fill out and send to: Campus Partners, 1824 N. High St., Columbus, OH 43201.
You also may send completed evaluation forms through the U.S. Mail to Campus Partners, 1824 N. High St., Columbus, OH 43201.
You need not respond to all questions. You may simply give an overall impression with written comments at the end of this form.
Please check the name of the team whose proposal you are evaluating on this form:
____Towne Properties/Madison Marquette
____The Druker Co.
____LaSalle/Casto/Arshot
Strength of the design concept: The Gateway Center should set a high standard of urban and architectural design and serve as a worthy architectural presence at this major gateway to the university. Please rate the overall quality of the design.
____ excellent ____ good ____ fair ____ poor ____ no opinion
Comments
Serving the market: The Gateway Center should include a lively
mix of uses which draws students, university employees, nearby residents
and visitors to High Street throughout the day and evening. How well will
the proposed anchor tenants and mix of uses serve the High Street market,
including students, minorities, international students and highly varying
income levels?
____ excellent ____ good ____ fair ____ poor ____ no opinion
Comments
Team composition: Each team is composed of developer firm(s), architects
and other professionals in the fields of traffic, parking, landscape design,
and historic preservation. Please rate the overall strength of the team
in its ability to successfully build the University Gateway Center and
to work with the community:
____ excellent ____ good ____ fair ____ poor ____ no opinion
Comments
Community involvement: Each team was asked to describe how students,
neighborhood leaders and other stakeholders would be involved in the review
and implementation of this project. Please rate how well the team addressed
this issue:
____ excellent ____ good ____ fair ____ poor ____ no opinion
Comments
Economic development: Each proposal should include an employment
program to link both construction and service jobs created by the Gateway
project with the employment needs of neighborhood residents and students.
Please rate the employment program as proposed.
____ excellent ____ good ____ fair ____ poor ____ no opinion
Comments
Small and minority-owned businesses: One goal of the Gateway Center
is to help revitalize the independent, locally owned businesses along
High Street and in the nearby neighborhoods, as well as encouraging minority
owned businesses. How well has the team addressed these issues?
____ excellent ____ good ____ fair ____ poor ____ no opinion
Comments
Housing issues: The proposal should include a component of mixed-income
rental housing designed to appeal to a broader cross-section of the community.
In addition to market-rate housing, the major housing project within the
Gateway Center may include a mix of 15 to 20 percent low-income units.
How well has the proposal addressed housing issues?
____ excellent ____ good ____ fair ____ poor ____ no opinion
Comments
Demographic questions: Please check all that describe you.
____ OSU student
____ OSU faculty or staff
____ live in the 43201, 43202, 43210 zip codes
____ live in Columbus (but not in 43201, 43202 or 43210 zip codes)
____ own business or property in 43201, 43202, 43210 zip codes
Please use the space below to write additional comments you may have about this proposal.